Part I: Human history:
Despite
modern scientific effort, human history remains largely unknown. It’s
true that human artifacts and bones date back 28,000 years or more; and
the fossil record shows evidence of hominid-like creatures going back
over millions of years. But actual recorded history, written or
preserved by those who lived it, reveals a scant 6000 years at most and
accounts for a mere fraction of time humans have spent on Earth.
First
hand records of human history prior to 6000 years ago are non-existent,
save a thread of story here or there, but with the millennia of
unaccounted time, it seems probable that important cultures and
technologies arose prior to what is known today.
Archeological
evidence shows similar pottery and metal objects found across the
expanse of Europe and Asia, implying organized manufacture and trade
took place long before written history. However, since precise accounts
of this activity are lost, we can only extrapolate what happened by
comparing ancient discoveries to how we live today.
The
possibility of lost civilizations and technology appeals to the
historian inside us all, and gives wonder to how man first discovered
things like farming. How did man discover the seed? Or that seeds
require water? Was farming invented in one locale and passed around the
globe? Or did humans themselves spread around the globe because they
knew how to farm?
What about manufacturing and trade among
people? Is it instinctual to barter and trade? And who was the first
person to invent manufacturing? It wasn’t Henry Ford. Was organized
trade established before the first cities? Or was trade and
manufacturing the viable basis for people to gather in cities?
Don’t
you wish there was a book that documented the ‘history of
manufacturing,’ complete with pictures of the earliest inventers, their
tools, the things they made, how they made them, and what they traded
for? That would be a quintessential Smithsonian exhibit wouldn’t it?
What
about the wheel? Wouldn’t it be amazing to read the full history of the
wheel, from invention to widespread use? Was it invented simultaneously
in different parts of the globe, or did a single genius named
‘El-Edison’ invent it in his shop down by the river, and from there, it
spread outward from the ‘father of the wheel?’
Just imagine the
wheel changing production and energizing trade across the world, it
probably revolutionized culture wherever it went.
If today’s
model of the world mimics earlier cultures, then the wheel probably
sparked vicious confrontation as cultural purists tried to stop the
inevitable social upheaval caused by changing the rituals of asset
production. Conservative versus progressive is no-doubt an age-old
fight, but we’ll never know because the fight was never as important as
the wheel itself.
And what about the fence? Did the first fence
arise because men and women, fearing invasion, piled stones around
themselves for safety? Or did Lores-Picasso climb out of a tree and
abstractly tie long sticks together into a mat, then stand them upright
into a circle? Can you imagine the gawks and hoots from his treemates
until 20 years later somebody discovered you could sleep prone and
protected on the ground using Lores’ invention.
Most questions
in history will never have an answer, and the knowledge of exactly how
and when and who is gone forever. There are no monuments for mama and
papa Jonel for inventing the rock fence, or El-Edison for his
revolutionary wheel. The only monument to this ancient human history is
the continued use of their inventions today.
Somehow man
invented ways to manipulate his environment to advantage, and those who
did it best in their time, lived best… and those who adopted successes
from the past and remembered the lessons of history were better able to
meet the future. Using history is what people do to survive; after all
farming is taught from one generation to the next, and if nobody
remembered Lores Picasso’s stick circle, they wouldn’t have reaped the
benefits throughout all these years.
So the real measure of
human history is the contribution the present makes to the future. And
so the natural question follows: what contribution will we make:
Sewers, concrete, glass, plastic, rubber, airplanes, electricity? Will
our contributions pass forward like the wheel, or be lost 20,000 years
from now? Certainly it’s possible our technology could become
culturally unimportant, and fall into disuse just like the sustained
knowledge it took to precisely fit twenty-ton stones together in
Pharaoh Egypt.
All things stand in their own time, and the
inevitable march of time causes language and culture to change quickly.
As evidence of this, only a scant two hundred generations of people
have passed since the Sun God ordered hieroglyphs carved inside his
tomb. You’ve seen more than 200 people standing in a theatre line and
know it’s a tiny number, yet the entire Egyptian language and culture
was lost in less than those 200 generations and would’ve remained so
except for the chance discovery of the Rosetta stone and the persistent
work of one linguist.
The fate of ancient Egypt shows how
rapidly knowledge and invention can be lost, and it sparks the question
if our technology was known before by men and somehow lost? Are
electricity and glass lost and found from millennia to millennia? The
answer is: not likely, despite Earth’s abundant supply of ingredients
for both.
Complex and sustained social activity was
required to invent modern technology. The invention of electricity
didn’t happen because one man tinkered in his shop. Electricity
required cooperation between laboratories staffed with motivated people
supported by stable governments and economies. Electricity was
developed incrementally. It took years of work by thousands of people,
each building on prior scientific discoveries while using simultaneous
advances in the fields of mathematics, metallurgy and glass production.
It took thousands of man hours over multiple generations to produce
electricity and it takes thousands, maybe a million people each day to
sustain electric production. The likelihood of this happening before is
remote.
The delicate chain of events needed to make useful
electricity today could have been interrupted at any time. If famine or
disease had engulfed the world’s population at the end of the 18th
century, the ensuing chaos might have ended our technological triumph
over human despair.
It’s important to note that
contributions to the history of man come from times of economic
stability and prosperity, and this is precisely because men who are
fighting to survive will eat the bird instead of studying its wings to
learn how to fly.
Invention requires stability and cooperation
between the people and their government. While war helps create lasers
and radar, the real contribution from these technologies comes when the
war ends and those inventions are used to explore space and map the
globe. Sustained warfare for the sake of warfare contributes nothing
and is destined to be forgotten by history.
It’s a mistake to
view history as a chronicle of war and conflict, when we know Somalia,
a country that epitomizes piracy and street squabble, will never invent
or contribute anything to mankind; no technology, no cure for disease,
nothing. What the endless warfare of Somalia teaches us is how
technologies are lost when people refuse to cooperate or trust.
The
real history of man is not about who conquered who, instead it’s the
contribution people make to the future of other men. We know this
because the only memories we have of pre- written history are the
successes they passed forward.
The point of this chapter is:
Our furthest ancestors can’t tell their stories, and there is no
handbook to research endless questions about their lives, yet we have a
direct connection because we use the most enduring technologies they
created, like the wheel and fence, and farming and trade, and brick
making and twine. These things were passed forward to us and they make
transparent the history of man, so when we ask how and why these things
exist today, we can see history and see what was done to provide for
us. Technological contributions from the past are the model for our
aspiration as a people.
Gene Haynes