Off
the seat of a
bicycle
Chapter 54) The Pallet Theory / countering the threat of violence
With
extremely aggressive drivers, I held a screwdriver in either in my
right hand for a throw, or moved it to my front left, letting them know
they were going to be damaged … and that works!
… a threat is the only thing that works against an assaultive law-breaking motorist.
There are two rules that govern threats towards cars.
Rule
1 for activists: Don’t be afraid to damage an assaultive car for easy
identification by the police. Caution: my recommendation says; do not
damage the person … only their property … as an activist, you must
refuse to die with your head stuck in someone’s muffler cage, on the
other hand, it is not your goal to cause injury to an assaultive
driver. Your purpose is to insult them and scare them as much as they
do you.
I don’t carry a gun, but I think it would be legal to
shoot a hole in an assaulter’s car. I tore off side-view mirrors a
couple times and I think damaging property in this case is totally
justified.
I think it’s important to mark the car, and I’ll tell
you why … those drivers don’t give one pig-shit if you lay doubled-over
on the road skinned bare like a run-over dog. And those guys do every
single day … pick up a newspaper … a cyclist is struck by a car once
every 20 seconds in America … bicycling remains a high-risk numbers
game with no protection provided by government or law … you are left to
your own wits to survive.
The next thing to remember is Rule #2: Threatening to damage an assaultive car is part and parcel to the Pallet Theory.
The
Pallet Theory is a bedrock activist tool; it says every sober car
driver will slow down and carefully drive around a wooden pallet lying
in the street.
Car drivers carefully move around a pallet to
avoid possible damage to themselves or their vehicle … and, by strange
alignment of stars, they don’t blare a horn or hysterically wave their
finger at the pallet … nor does the driver get out of the car and
threaten to attack the pallet.
So the question becomes, if they
drive carefully and act decently around a wood pallet, why don’t they
do the same for a bicycle?
It’s simple; the Pallet Theory is
honest truth about the road: CAR DRIVERS ARE MORE CONCERNED WITH THEIR
PROPERTY THAN WITH YOUR SAFETY… and the cyclist can make themselves
equal to a wood pallet by offering up a threat.
… therefore when
the cyclist adds ‘threat-of-damage’ to the equation, the car driver
suddenly thinks twice about tailgating and whizzing closely past a
cyclist, and thus, the cyclist’s safety becomes a factor in car-driver
behavior.
Suffice to say however, car drivers will only see a
crazy bicycle rider threatening people on the road … and this is
precisely because the government refuses to take a public stand on your
behalf …
… the government is responsible for driver’s
education classes and responsible for issuing driving permits … YET
they say nothing about bicycles during this education except to tell
drivers: ‘the bicycle must stay outta the way,’ and this is a blatant
misrepresentation of constitutional law.
In a very real sense,
the government is engaged in conspiracy and racketeering by refusing to
grant minimal education to the driving-public over the issue of bicycle
safety. And this falls under the RICO statutes because the politicians
and judges and police are receiving money while allowing criminal
behavior to continue without deterrence ... and I'm sure a creative
federal prosecutor has thrown similar charges on undesirable folks for
much less death and carnage than bike riding..
…
none-the-less, implementing the Pallet Theory puts the government into
the bike-protection business and the news gets around to the
punks-and-drunks that you’re being watched by the police, and then bad
driving disappears off your regular route … in fact, accidents will be
reduced on your regular route.
Put that goat in your pipe and smoke it.
Accidents
are reduced on a bicycle activist’s regular route once the pallet
theory is put into practice. Suddenly every guy whose car got clunked,
now has perfect vision and can see you every time. The regular drunks
know to stay off that road too.
… it’s the truth: accidents are reduced by hard bicycle activism.
…
unfortunately, the larger population will find total disdain in your
person, because they believe it is their government-protected right to
drive any way they want around a bicycle … but mostly they dislike
people that threaten the local code.
Bicycle activism can never
gain support from the local code without government involvement … and
therefore the activist’s work becomes a cat chasing its tail … the more
you resist incumbent car-driver endangerment, the more reason the
government will have to push your dumb ass off the road…
… the
road is ruled by ‘might-makes-right,’ and the government supports this
attitude ... as long as it comes from the car and not the bike.
Chapter 55) Another police tailgater
Index of chapters